E-mail opnieuw ontwerpen: 6 functies die opnieuw moeten worden bekeken

E-mail opnieuw ontwerpen

Depending on who you ask, e-mail has been around for between 30 and 40 years. Its value is obvious, with applications spanning across both social and professional aspects of life. What’s also apparent, however, is how outdated e-mail technology really is. In many ways, e-mail is being retrofitted to remain relevant to the growing needs of today’s users.

But how often can you tinker with something before you admit that maybe its time has passed? When you start examining the pitfalls of e-mail and identify areas of improvement, you start to realize how different an ‘e-mail 2.0’ would be if it was built and launched today. What features would be included or improved? And what would be left out? Would its new design lend itself to other applications?

If we were to recreate e-mail today, here are six foundations that would serve as the new e-mail platform. I don’t know about you, but if I could use this system, I’d be one happy and more efficient camper…

Geen e-mailadressen meer

Onze inboxen zijn absoluut rommelig. Werkelijk, volgens de Radicati Group, 84% of e-mail received today is spam. Because this is pretty simple: e-mail addresses are open. All anyone needs is your email address and ‘voila’ – they are in your inbox. In E-mail 2.0, there would be a permission-based system that has one single identifier. And this identifier would remain as private as one’s mobile number.

Inbox verdwenen

Once we get the ‘identification’ and permission method for users right, we can get rid of the inbox. Yep, the inbox. E-mail 2.0 would better serve both businesses and customers if each ‘conversation’ or each message thread bypassed a ‘catch all’ kind of bucket, aka the inbox. A direct pipe between a business and its audience members would be a much-welcomed improvement.

Veilige interactie

The open nature of email addresses and the barrage of spam also means we have become accustomed to viruses, phishing attempts, and scams. With no integrity, anything than can be ‘charged back’ is prohibited. So, with e-mail 2.0, we’d want to be able to pay bills, sign confidential documents and assign over intellectual property. This could only happen if a secure, fully encrypted channel were opened between sender and recipient thus ensuring non-repudiation.

Real-time communicatie met verantwoording

When you send an email message, what happens to it? Is it trashed, caught by the spam filter, read, ignored? The truth is; you don’t know. With e-mail 2.0, accountability and reporting will be front and center. Much like how texting works, our e-mail of the future will be messenger-based and encourage real-time, direct interaction. Always on and always efficient.

Mobiliteit

The rapid growth of mobile suggests it’s probably time for a platform that’s designed solely with mobile-usage in mind. Life is moving much faster than it did 30 years ago and with that, gone are lengthy emails and fancy HTML graphics that serve no purpose. People prefer communicating using only a few words, usually via a chat platform. So e-mail 2.0 would have to ensure better connections; short, timely and designed to be read on a mobile phone no matter where the recipient is in the world.

Hechtingsfobie

Hoewel dit zo veel in ons leven zou kunnen verwijzen, heeft deze specifieke verwijzing betrekking op de bestanden die zijn bijgevoegd bij de e-mail die onze kant op is gestuurd. De gemiddelde Amerikaan besteedt ongeveer zes minuten per dag aan het zoeken naar bijlagen en bestanden. Dat vertaalt zich in drie dagen productiviteitsverlies per jaar. E-mail 2.0 zou ongetwijfeld begrijpen welke bijlagen we ontvingen en deze dienovereenkomstig beheren. Sla deze daar op, verplaats die hier. Markeer deze voor betaling enz.

Wat denk je?

Deze site gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Ontdek hoe uw reactiegegevens worden verwerkt.